A national parliament building represents people's identity, and that the people feel proud of their existence being unique. Functionally, the building provides space for the people, represented by a bunch of talkers, to critic or support ideas on how to make public lives better. So, I think it is normal to dream of having a new national parliament building like what the President of Parliament alluded two weeks ago.
The building currently used by the National Parliament is a meeting hall located at the backside of the Government Palace. I heard that, prior independence, it was used for provincial government meetings, and etc. It is located in the backdoor, the space-use is so squished. Parliament office rooms are made of prefabricated materials, and parking space is packed during busy times. It also sits in city center that , in many ways, affect so much to the public interest. For example, traffic chaos occur due to frequent road closures for demonstrations, official events such as foreign dignitary state visits, and annual state budget debates.
There are many people opposing this so-called ambitious plan due to many reasons but financial. Yes, we do still have many priority areas that we must spend money on. For example, on health, and education sectors, and basic infrastructure services. However, it does not mean that the government can not start to think about it. The government can start a serious planning, strong political decision power, and do it in phases. One reason why the government needs to plan it seriously is that because there have been different plans showing up which come from different leaders in different times. For example, few years back, the planned location was in Tasi-Tolu. There has been design of a super building taking up Tasi-Tolu lakes (picture above). The location now has moved to Hera. This shows that the notion deserve total opposition from the public.
Constructing a national parliament building and complex does cost hundreds of millions of this $. RDTL does not have money to make the project a one go like most major infrastructure projects in the past which took up so much to other priority areas. So, the government has to be wise enough. At least from the beginning to make the public believe by providing a definitive location (acquire the land) based on studies, not based on personal preference. Next will be bringing basic infrastructure, and then will be the building?. Considering the opposing argument, I think the government can still do it, but in a realistic way.
The challenging thing is that decisions are made not rationally, but emotionally most of the times. Things tend to be done quick and fast in order to satisfy short terms goals. This kind of attitude should be changed by our society sooner or later, or we go bankrupt.
**Hope this gives you an inspiration.